<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eben Moglen Whacks Tim O&#8217;Reilly!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snaplogic.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=65" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snaplogic.com/blog/?p=65</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Open Source, Data Services, and Integration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SnapLogic Blog &#187; More on Eben and Open Source Licenses</title>
		<link>http://www.snaplogic.com/blog/?p=65&#038;cpage=1#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>SnapLogic Blog &#187; More on Eben and Open Source Licenses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snaplogic.org/?p=65#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>[...] in the discussion (here, here, here and here) on Eben Moglen&#8217;s session with Tim O&#8217;Reilly on Licensing in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the discussion (here, here, here and here) on Eben Moglen&#8217;s session with Tim O&#8217;Reilly on Licensing in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog / freedom &#8216;for users&#8217;- which users did you mean, exactly? (or, of users, user-deployers, and user-consumers)</title>
		<link>http://www.snaplogic.com/blog/?p=65&#038;cpage=1#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog / freedom &#8216;for users&#8217;- which users did you mean, exactly? (or, of users, user-deployers, and user-consumers)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 01:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snaplogic.org/?p=65#comment-363</guid>
		<description>[...] freedom &#8216;for users&#8217;- which users did you mean, exactly? (or, of users, user-deployers, and user-consumers)  &#8220;Free software&#8230; refers to four kinds of freedom, for the users of the software&#8230;&#8221; &#8211;Free Software Definition, emphasis mine&#8221;closing the [ASP] loophole would infringe on certain peoples rights and he [Moglen] didn’t see any way to preserve everyone’s rights&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; Eben Moglen, as paraphrased here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] freedom &#8216;for users&#8217;- which users did you mean, exactly? (or, of users, user-deployers, and user-consumers)  &#8220;Free software&#8230; refers to four kinds of freedom, for the users of the software&#8230;&#8221; &#8211;Free Software Definition, emphasis mine&#8221;closing the [ASP] loophole would infringe on certain peoples rights and he [Moglen] didn’t see any way to preserve everyone’s rights&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; Eben Moglen, as paraphrased here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.snaplogic.com/blog/?p=65&#038;cpage=1#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snaplogic.org/?p=65#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian, I can&#039;t speak to Tim&#039;s greed or any personal animosity toward Stallman. I only know that Eben could have made every one of his points and been more convincing without slinging mud at Tim.  

As for duplicity, I thought that some of Eben&#039;s comments had some of that as well.  FSF/GPL are not the only licenses around and to claim that he &#039;carried Tim&#039;s water&#039; conveniently ignores the contributions to open source by the Mozilla, Apache and the BSD communities.

Finally, just to be clear, I don&#039;t think Tim, O&#039;Reilly Media or OSCON are making a proposal for Microsoft or have anything to do whatsoever with their effort to get approval of their license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian, I can&#8217;t speak to Tim&#8217;s greed or any personal animosity toward Stallman. I only know that Eben could have made every one of his points and been more convincing without slinging mud at Tim.  </p>
<p>As for duplicity, I thought that some of Eben&#8217;s comments had some of that as well.  FSF/GPL are not the only licenses around and to claim that he &#8216;carried Tim&#8217;s water&#8217; conveniently ignores the contributions to open source by the Mozilla, Apache and the BSD communities.</p>
<p>Finally, just to be clear, I don&#8217;t think Tim, O&#8217;Reilly Media or OSCON are making a proposal for Microsoft or have anything to do whatsoever with their effort to get approval of their license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Berrigan</title>
		<link>http://www.snaplogic.com/blog/?p=65&#038;cpage=1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Berrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snaplogic.org/?p=65#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I disagree! You are either Full of it or myopically challenged. O&#039;Reilly has let his greed and his personal animosity toward R Stallman become a vendetta against
Free &amp;OS. Now he proposes letting MicroShaft in on the
Open Src licensing for some of their pseudo-open tricks.
It was time E Moglen called TO on his duplicity and i&#039;m glad he called a halt to the BS O&#039;Reilly has spouted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree! You are either Full of it or myopically challenged. O&#8217;Reilly has let his greed and his personal animosity toward R Stallman become a vendetta against<br />
Free &amp;OS. Now he proposes letting MicroShaft in on the<br />
Open Src licensing for some of their pseudo-open tricks.<br />
It was time E Moglen called TO on his duplicity and i&#8217;m glad he called a halt to the BS O&#8217;Reilly has spouted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
